Select Page

Thanks, but I’m not your lonely grandma.

From depositphotos.

Getting older doesn’t come with a handbook, but it does come with a lot of myths. People—sometimes even other seniors—carry around a set of assumptions about what life after 65 must look like.

Most of them are false. Some are insulting. And a few are downright dangerous.

1. Older people must be lonely.

A 90-year-old is praised for moving into a retirement community “to avoid loneliness.” But retirement communities can be cliquish and isolating.

In my recent book, I wrote about a doctor who brought a New York Times and flowers to his “lonely” patient. Why assume she was lonely? Maybe she had friends in another state. Maybe her friends were busy. I’d feel better too if my doctor treated me like a three-dimensional person instead of a disease or a number.

A YouTube video shows a man handing out flowers to “lonely” elders. Nice gesture—unless you’re like me, giving flowers away so the cat won’t eat them and rack up another vet bill.

And then there are the videos of strangers offering to join someone dining alone. Why assume they’re lonely? Maybe they’re enjoying their own company—and a good book.

2. If you’re older and alone, you must need help.

Standing on a street corner with your iPhone, waiting for an Uber? Strangers assume you’re lost.

One stranger said to me, “You look old. My mom is old. She needs a lot of help. So I figure you would too.”

I just got back from Italy, where I often was lost. Nobody offered help. They assumed I’d figure it out. I did.

3. If you’re dining with a younger person, you must be their parent, grandparent, or helpless patient.

What’s so hard about imagining cross-generational friendships? Why not assume the diners are equals?

4. Older people are supposed to be endlessly patient.

Wait three hours for a doctor? You’re expected to smile and say nothing. Complain, and you’re “difficult.”

Aches, pains, or disabilities? Smile through them. Get insulted? “Lighten up.”
Lose one thing? Gain another.
Can’t work for market pay? Volunteer for free.
Trouble walking? Use a cane—you “won’t notice the difference.”

Sure.

Some people think other species or even other races have a different capacity for pain. They extend this belief to people who are “older.” They figure either you feel pain less or you’re more used to it. Either way, it’s cruel.

5. Older people must be mentally deficient.

You can’t use a computer. You’re thrilled to be called “sweetheart.” You’d rather have a hug than a scientific explanation if you get a serious diagnosis.

But “sweetheart” is for children and cats (I call my cat “sweetie” and she doesn’t mind). Older adults are not children.

6. If you’re not a picture of health, it’s your fault.

Articles proclaim: “How to improve your health at any age!” Or “Live longer in 5 easy steps.”

Reality check: Only 40% of cancers are avoidable. The rest are hereditary. I worked for “buns of steel” and still got hip arthritis. The doctor just shrugged and said, “It happens.”

Hearing loss, cataracts, macular degeneration—often hereditary. Money helps, but socioeconomic status remains the biggest predictor of how “healthy” your old age will be.

7. The biggest fear must be dying.

Wrong. Many older people fear helplessness more than death. They’d rather be dead than dependent. They’d rather be dead than enter a nursing home.

Yet most research is about suicide prevention and extending life at all costs. I’ve read countless studies on how to keep older people alive. But I’ve never seen a study of elders who were prevented from ending their lives, whether through lack of access to assisted dying or suicide prevention.

We assume they’re grateful. But where’s the evidence?
Often, the focus is less on the older person’s quality of life and more on keeping younger survivors—sons, daughters—happy.

Final thought

The problem isn’t just that these assumptions are wrong. It’s that they erase individuality. They flatten older people into stereotypes: lonely, helpless, grateful, deficient, or afraid.

The truth? Older people are as varied and complex as anyone else. And the biggest danger isn’t age itself—it’s believing the myths

Service “gogograndparents”

Image by quino-al-xhGMQ_nYWqU-unsplash.jpg

I just ran across a service out there named ‘GogoGrandparent.”  Their website promises they give seniors access to services that keep them independent.

It seems they make it easier for people who aren’t tech-savvy to call an Uber or Lyft, order groceries, or do other chores. Their website says, “Our innovative GoGoGrandparent technology enhances the reliability and usability of partners like Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, and others, ensuring seniors can live independently in their homes for as long as possible.”

I saw a thread on Reddit that showed how a GoGoGrandparent call will look to an Uber driver. The call is identified as coming from GoGoGrandparent. The drivers seem to take these calls in stride, although they point out that a person without a smartphone won’t know the Uber or Lyft is coming. They just wait in the pickuup spot. Personally, I’ve had drivers go to the wrong pickup spot, so I don’t know how that would work…but it’s not frequent. The drivers say that some older patrons give them cupcakes and cash tips, which they appreciate.

The AI overview says it  “is a premium service that adds a per-minute fee and sometimes a membership cost to the standard Uber or Lyft fare. GoGoGrandparent provides phone-based assistance and other services for seniors who may not use smartphones, making it a convenience-based service rather than a cost-saving option.”

I can see where this service would be extremely valuable to some people. But I have three quibbles about the service:

(1) The name is awful! Not all older people are grandparents. And the name “GoGoGrandparent” seems to b gently teasing their clients, who may be mobility challenged. The illustrations on the site show stereotypes of older people, smiling, with white hair.

I notice that the website itself uses the term “Gogo” without the word “grandparent.” Maybe they intend to rebrand more broadly. In fact, at one point the website refers to “seniors and disabled people.” A lot of people assume most seniors are disabled, when in fact most are not. It would be nice if there were a more neutral term. And perhaps they’ll rebrand. In fact…

(2) Why is the service restricted to seniors? Lots of people of all ages may need this service if they’re visually impaired or have other issues that interfere with using a smartphone.

(3) Finally, the service will eventually be outdated. Elsewhere, I’ve written about the fact that tech-challenges are cohort-based rather than age-based. As this cohort ages, people over 65 will be right at home with all kinds of tech.

Today,  a 75-year-old would have been born in 1949 or 1950 (depending on the month). In 1984, when Apple aired its famous SuperBowl commercial, they’d have been in their mid-thirties. That commercial introduced the new PC and revolutionized the online world. They wouldn’t have learned computer systems in school, but they’d probably face technology on the job. In their thirties, they’d be learning tech.

Someone who’s 55 will be 75 twenty years from now. They were born in 1970 and they were 14 when that commercial was aired. If they went to college, they couldn’t escape tech.  In the 1990s websites became common. Smartphones became popular around 2010, when this generation was in their 40s. It’s hard to believe they didn’t learn to use them.

At 75, twenty years from now, they’ll be right at home with ordering by phone. They’ll order everything from Ubers to dinners.

True, some people will still be challenged, but it won’t be because they’re old.  They’ll have other issues.

So I was a bit disappointed to come across a service with this ageist brand, with the word “grandparent” in the title. I’ve known lots of people over 65 who aced their smartphones…and some younger people who were proud to be Luddites. It’s a little sad to see the stereotypes preserved, even though the service will undoubtedly be valuable to many people of *all* ages.